I opened a letter this morning sent to me by my friend Daniel, who is incarcerated at Montana State Prison. In it, he asked if I would write him a poem about freedom. We’ve been pen pals for 5 or 6 years and one of the things we’ve been writing back and forth about lately is poetry. I send him poems I’ve written or someone else has written, and he sends me poems he’s written.
It’s not often – and by “not often” I mean I can think of only one other time – I am directly asked to write about something in particular. I am intrigued by his ask and appreciate the prompt.
What came up for me straight away was: Is freedom the same thing as liberation? As a practitioner in a Buddhist-based spiritual tradition, our teachings center around liberation. Simply put, liberation is the ultimate aim of our practice. If we practice in such a way that doesn’t give rise to liberation, whelp, I reckon something is amiss in our approach.
My very first thought in response to my own question Is freedom the same thing as liberation? was yep! Same thing! But then I started wondering if maybe freedom & liberation are synonymous but only in the ultimate dimension (which is a Buddhisty way of saying: when zoomed out and looking/feeling through the lens of the whole cosmos and the entire realm of lifeforce energy). In the historical dimension, however (which is a Buddhisty way of saying: when zoomed in to our individual life, where the trash needs to be taken out and we need to earn money to live), perhaps freedom & liberation are two different things.
Here’s what I’m pondering: in the historical dimension, maybe freedom involves a certain physicality, whereas liberation pertains to the mind. So, some examples of freedom would be: quitting a job because it’s sucking your will to live; ending a romantic relationship that has been dragging & draining; making the final payment on your car or student loan or mortgage; moving to a new town/city/state/country because you needed a fresh start; regaining the use of your own two feet after months spent on crutches; having your energy restored after a long bout of illness; getting released from prison.
Freedom, in these cases, is the act of being physically removed from something binding or constrictive. If I were bound to a chair for an hour and then someone came along and untied me, I would experience freedom from being restricted to that chair. You get the point.
Liberation, on the other hand, is an inside job. Liberation pertains to the content and quality of our mental activity and the lens through which we see the world. Liberation does not depend or rely on anything external.
I am considering, then, that one can experience freedom without feeling liberated, and vice versa. I am also considering that in the ultimate dimension, these states are rather firm and steady, whereas in the historical dimension, they are fluid and ever-changing.
In the historical dimension, freedom for one person is normalized for another. Daniel’s idea of freedom might mean to get out of prison, whereas mine might be to get out of debt. So freedom for one person is not necessarily freedom for another. Also: the felt experience of freedom tends to wear off and becomes normalized over time. Liberation, while in flux and influenced by externals, generally involves the same basic qualities of felt experience: open, unbound, connected, at ease.
Or maybe freedom belongs to the historical dimension and liberation belongs to the ultimate dimension. Hmm.